Plaintiff Robert V. Durrsein
AMC Branch
PO Box 33633
Dayton, OH 45433-0629

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Southern District of Ohio

NOTE: New unit number for Defendant Betty Chaney.

Now comes the Plaintiff requesting the court to reject the aforesaid motion mailed on or about May 16, 2000.

The State of Ohio certainly would wish this to be dismissed. And the State tries to hide their criminal activities behind the Eleventh Amendment of United States Constitution.

However, Consider the following:

1. The First ten Amendments of the United States Constitution and the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments demonstrate that where a conflict within the United States Constitution may arise, the weight of the multiple rights and provisions elsewhere in the United States Constitution should override the ability of one party to hide behind a single provision of the United States Constitution, thereby escaping the just moral, legal, and Constitutional consequences of their actions.
2. Plaintiff contends the State of Ohio and the Supreme Court of Ohio have continuously aided and abetted individuals and organizations in the violation of the Plaintiff’s rights under the laws and Constitution of the State of Ohio, the Laws of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution. Specifically, The Supreme Court of Ohio has recklessly and deliberately endorsed and abetted such criminal acts as Perjury, Child Abuse, Illegal Wire-Tapping, Violation of Attorney-Client Privilege, Tampering with Evidence, violation of the free press, and other violations of law, the previously mentioned Constitutions, and ethics as will be shown by evidence, documentation and testimony to be presented to a jury in this case.
3. The State of Ohio and the Supreme Court of Ohio will be shown, by the documentation, evidence, and testimony to have clearly and continuously violated and/or conspired to violate the laws of the State of Ohio, the United States Constitution, and the laws and regulations of the United States.
4. The essence of the United States Constitution is to "... establish Justice, insure domestic tranquility, . . . promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty for ourselves and our Posterity,…" No party, not even a state, has the right to establish a pattern of criminal and other activities which continuously and grievously violate this. As the evidence, testimony, and documentation will show, a pattern of corruption and illegal activities has existed for decades in the Supreme Court of Ohio with the knowledge and support of the State of Ohio.
5. Further, the evidence, documentation and testimony will clearly show that this corruption and endorsement of illegal activities extents into this very court and even into the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. When completed in front of a Jury, the record will clearly demonstrate that cronyism in the courts overrides local, state, and national laws, court procedures, and even the United States Constitution.
6. Evidence to be subpoenaed from the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justice will further demonstrate that they had full knowledge and evidence of the criminal behavior and failed to act. This ongoing endorsement of criminal, unethical, and unconstitutional behavior by all parties in the judicial system has forced upon Plaintiff the burden of defending the integrity of the United States Constitution against those who would deny all citizens in the great State of Ohio their rights under the Constitution and laws of the State of Ohio and under the laws and Constitution of the United States of America. Tragically, the United States Constitution is under a more insidious and greater attack in Dayton, Ohio, than from any foreign nation or terrorist organization.
7. Since the legal authorities in the State of Ohio, in the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Justice, and the Federal Courts have continuously refused to perform their sworn duties to uphold the laws and founding documents of the state and nation, they may not escape by now claiming exemption under the same sets of laws and documents. Their hypocrisy may not be allowed to become yet another corrupt legal precept.
8. Certainly Defendants seek to cite precedents which would dilute the United States Constitution and allow them to escape the legal and moral consequences of their behavior. However, Plaintiff contends that the United States Constitution is the ultimate precedent. Now is the time for the United States Supreme Court to set a new precedent to establish the United States Constitution as truly meaningful to each and every individual citizen of these United States.
9. Therefore, Plaintiff requests the Court to deny the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.

Robert V. Durrstein, Plaintiff